Family Physicians' Perceived Needs Regarding Their Mental Health and Wellbeing in Infectious Catastrophic Events: A Mixed Studies Literature Review.

During catastrophes, physicians face significant stress and emotional challenges. This review explored existing evidence about the challenges family physicians face during infectious catastrophes, and their perceived well-being needs.

We conducted a mixed studies literature review using 2 databases, Ovid MEDLINE ALL (1946 to February 2023) and PsycInfo on Ovid (1806 to February 2023). To assess methodological quality, we used Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The extracted data were analyzed employing a data-based convergent mixed methods design.

Thirty-four (34) studies met the criteria for data extraction. Line-by-line coding for thematic analysis was applied to Result and Discussion sections of included articles. Findings were categorized into 4 levels: Societal, Institutional, Organizational, and Individual. Seven themes were identified in total.

Public health authorities should focus on systemic changes, including organizational development to improve coordination within and across organizations. Clinician involvement in decision-making, clear communication, mental health support, and adequate resources are crucial. Policy implications underscore the necessity for healthcare policies prioritizing physician well-being, and organizational support during infectious catastrophes. Improving work conditions extends beyond personal protective equipment (PPE) access, requiring swift betterment of service innovations, with ongoing reassessment for sustainable care planning, financing, and delivery beyond emergencies.
Mental Health
Access

Authors

Zahedi Zahedi, Tellier Tellier, Luconi Luconi, Gore Gore, Rodríguez Rodríguez
View on Pubmed
Share
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Linkedin
Copy to clipboard