Agreeing a set of biopsychosocial variables for collection across the UK Eating Disorders Clinical Research Network: a consensus study using adapted nominal group technique.
Eating disorders are serious psychiatric disorders associated with high levels of co-occurring physical and mental health conditions and poor treatment outcomes. The collection of standardised, routinely collected data within clinical services holds promise to improve patient care.
To agree on a set of biopsychosocial variables for routine data collection within eating disorder services in the UK.
Two online workshops were conducted using an adapted nominal group technique to agree on priorities for data collection in adult and child/adolescent eating disorder services. Workshop participants (n=43) consisted of people with lived experience, carers, clinicians and researchers. Two researchers independently conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the workshop transcripts to identify qualitative priorities for data collection. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the results of online voting.
Thematic analysis identified four superordinate themes for data collection in eating disorder services: (1) a mutually valued and beneficial collaboration; (2) a holistic approach; (3) a balance between standardisation and individualisation; (4) doing no harm. Quantitative analysis of voting identified priorities across a range of domains, leading to a proposed biopsychosocial dataset.
This project agreed on a set of biopsychosocial variables for routine data collection in the UK Eating Disorders Clinical Research Network. Further research should evaluate the implementation success of these variables.
Patients, caregivers and clinicians support routine data collection in eating disorder services so long as the measures used are considered meaningful, not overly burdensome, non-stigmatising and collected in collaboration between patients and treatment providers.
To agree on a set of biopsychosocial variables for routine data collection within eating disorder services in the UK.
Two online workshops were conducted using an adapted nominal group technique to agree on priorities for data collection in adult and child/adolescent eating disorder services. Workshop participants (n=43) consisted of people with lived experience, carers, clinicians and researchers. Two researchers independently conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the workshop transcripts to identify qualitative priorities for data collection. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the results of online voting.
Thematic analysis identified four superordinate themes for data collection in eating disorder services: (1) a mutually valued and beneficial collaboration; (2) a holistic approach; (3) a balance between standardisation and individualisation; (4) doing no harm. Quantitative analysis of voting identified priorities across a range of domains, leading to a proposed biopsychosocial dataset.
This project agreed on a set of biopsychosocial variables for routine data collection in the UK Eating Disorders Clinical Research Network. Further research should evaluate the implementation success of these variables.
Patients, caregivers and clinicians support routine data collection in eating disorder services so long as the measures used are considered meaningful, not overly burdensome, non-stigmatising and collected in collaboration between patients and treatment providers.
Authors
Jewell Jewell, Smith Smith, Downs Downs, Carnegie Carnegie, Kakar Kakar, Meldrum Meldrum, Qi Qi, Foye Foye, Malouf Malouf, Baker Baker, Virgo Virgo, Okoro Okoro, Griffiths Griffiths, Munblit Munblit, Herle Herle, Schmidt Schmidt, Byford Byford, Landau Landau, Llewellyn Llewellyn, Nicholls Nicholls, Ayton Ayton, McNeil McNeil, Anderson Anderson, Breen Breen, Allen Allen
View on Pubmed